The Whovian Physicians’ Desk Reference: Part 1

Editor’s Note: Unfortunately for John, he finished this article right before the BBC released the first official photo of the new Doctor in his costume. Despite this, the speculation is worth comparing to the actual outcome. The second part of this article will address the new developments. 

If there is one thing Who fans love, it’s speculating about a new Doctor. Everything from his clothes, personality, to the new Doctor’s eating habits is mulled over a thousand times by fans trying to guess before it is revealed. One popular part of this speculation is wondering which previous Doctor(s) this new incarnation will be most like, so I thought it would be fun to throw in my opinions on how much (if any) Peter Capaldi’s Doctor will pull from each of the previous incarnations. Let’s go!

The First Doctor, played by William Hartnell

First_Doctor_colourCapaldi was born in 1958, which means he’s been on the Who wagon pretty much from day one (the show premiered in 1963) and that means his first Doctor was the First Doctor. Many people hold to the idea that your first incarnation of the Doctor is destined to become your favorite. While I don’t totally subscribe to that theory, I do believe that your first Doctor greatly colors how you think the role should be handled. The First Doctor was a bit of a cranky old man who didn’t suffer fools and left the fighting to others. Over time, we got to see the loving and dignified soul underneath all the grumpiness. Since this version of the Doctor is the start of a whole new cycle of regenerations, it might be fitting to go right back to the source and have Capaldi be a grouch with a heart of gold. Capaldi could easily pull off a First Doctor-esque costume and I would like to see Capaldi have a prop to work with (other than the Sonic Screwdriver) like the First Doctor’s cane or the Seventh’s umbrella. While I do think this new incarnation will indeed be crabbier than Matt Smith’s version (Capaldi is way too good at angry and frustrated for him not to be), I don’t think going full First Doctor would be in any way palatable to the modern audience. Modern Who also needs a man of action and that most decidedly isn’t the First Doctor’s style.  Capaldi might pull from Hartnell in terms of fashion and being a little short tempered, but that will be about it.

The Second Doctor, played by Patrick Troughton

2nd-doctorTo many (myself included), Doctor Who didn’t fully form into the show we know and love today until the Second Doctor came along. This incarnation was energetic, fun-loving, and enjoyed playing the clown to lull his enemies into a false sense of security. He was a bit of a fidget that always seemed to need something to do, often playing with hands, his recorder, or whatever else he could get his hands on to keep himself occupied. The Second Doctor is lovingly nicknamed “The Cosmic Hobo” due to his disheveled appearance. His clothes were a reflection of just how much more carefree the Second Doctor was in relation to the First, an outward reflection of his somewhat scatterbrained genius, and another tool he used to make himself appear non-threatening. All this except for the clothes sounds perfect for Capaldi, except that the previous Doctor, Matt Smith already  pulled so much from Troughton. It is no secret that Tomb of the Cybermen was the story Smith watched when he said he had figured out how to play the Doctor, and while Smith’s Eleventh Doctor was his own man with his own ways, it is impossible not to notice the Troughton influence in Smith’s performance. That is why Capaldi will have to steer clear of doing the Second Doctor because Capaldi and Moffat will want this new Doctor to be different than the last so pulling from Second Doctor is pretty much out of the question.

The Third Doctor, played by Jon Pertwee

Third_doctorNow we come to the Doctor that I feel Capaldi will most pull from, the Third Doctor. Number Three here was the dashing man of action and no longer relied on his companions to provide the muscle. This was a Doctor that could kick your ass, but would much rather tinker with things and have a nice cup of tea. He wore fancy clothes because he could pull it off damnably well. He was the James Bond of the Doctor’s incarnations. He was upright, moralistic, and direct, but also was the most outwardly paternalistic of all the Doctors. He saw his companions as charges to be looked after and he got quite attached to them. This version was like if your dad was at least fifty times cooler (and my Dad is pretty cool to start with)  and wanted to take you on awesome adventures. This style of Doctor is perfect for Capaldi. Not only does he look damn good when dressed up, but this approach lets him play with the intensity he is known for while balancing it out with the softer paternal side. The paternal angle also works for how he should act around his current companion, Clara. Given the obvious age difference between Capaldi and Coleman, this path would avoid any possible negative reaction a more causal or even romantic  relationship might incur from the fandom and parents of the little kids watching the show. Time will tell if I’m right, but I do feel this approach would make a great fit.

The Fourth Doctor, played by Tom Baker

Stones of Blood Publicity 2The Fourth Doctor really was his own animal. He was a bit on the messy side like the Second Doctor, but unlike the former, it wasn’t any part of a put on, it was just who the Fourth Doctor was. This enigma of a man had a serious sweet tooth, a ridiculously oversized scarf, and a passion and hope to find something new and exciting around every corner. He was an egotist (to an even greater degree than his third incarnation), a contrarian, and free spirit. He was a man of extreme principle who had little reverence for position or titles. He judged all not by who they were, but by what they did. To him the most terrible things in the universe (after the Daleks of course) were anything tedious or boring. He was every bit the Bohemian. It is fitting that this version of the Doctor was the one that once dressed like Sherlock Holmes as he shared more than a few traits with the famous detective. The Fourth Doctor, my favorite Doctor by the way, was simply that, The Fourth Doctor. I don’t see Capaldi going for anything remotely Fourth Doctor-ish in terms of outfit, Baker’s look is still so iconic. What Capaldi may try and grab onto is this version’s mercurial nature. We can also expect a great deal to be done with the eyes as Capaldi has the most expressive eyes of any actor to take the role since Tom Baker and both actors are known to use them to great effect.

The Fifth Doctor, played by Peter Davison

fifth_doctorThe Fifth Doctor was a reaction to the previous four. Where all the former Doctors had appeared middle aged or in the First Doctor’s case, elderly, the Fifth Doctor was younger and more upbeat. it was a new era for Who and Peter Davison was leading the charge. This new Doctor loved the sport of cricket (his outfit, in fact, was that of Edwardian cricketer’s kit), wore a stick of celery, and was much more of a team player then any of the previous incarnations. This was a Doctor who used  the skills of those around him instead of trying to do everything himself. He was plain-spoken and earnest, and he believed in the best in people. He wasn’t the commanding presence taking the room with a thunderous voice when necessary as the last two Doctors had been. Instead, he was the calm voice of reason who tried to mediate everything if possible. When his words didn’t work, he backed them up with action. This was a Doctor ready and willing to put his life on the line to keep his word or achieve his goals. His run ended with him saving the life of his companion Peri, unsure if he was going to be able to regenerate or not. This Doctor was the first to really deal with loss, as the tragic death of his friend Adirc haunted him until the very end. I don’t see Capaldi taking that much from the Fifth Doctor in terms of clothes or personality. That fresh-faced, aw shucks attitude of the Fifth Doctor just doesn’t seem like something Capaldi could pull off in a convincing manner.

The Sixth Doctor, played by Colin Baker

sixth-doctorThe Sixth Doctor came into this world like a shot. The rough regeneration due to the poisoning of the Fifth Doctor left this Doctor initially in what seemed like a case of bipolar affective disorder. He was soon more stable, his only problem now was that he was an ass. Outspoken, bombastic, and with a ferocious wit used on friends and foes alike, the Sixth Doctor had little patience for anyone or anything he didn’t feel was worthy of his time, which was in fact, a great deal of the universe. His choice in clothes was a reflection of his splintered psyche and total lack of giving a crap what anybody thought about him. He, in fact, considered himself to be highly stylish.  His was a journey to regain humility and perspective, that core of goodness we all loved about the Doctor was still in there and it slowly began to show more and more as the Sixth Doctor went along. The Sixth Doctor was the victim of interesting ideas that were poorly executed. This was a Doctor that never had a chance to fully come into his own on screen, and in fact most of his fans point to the comics, novels, and of course the Big Finish audio dramas for proof of his greatness and not the show itself. These outlets were able to take the time and develop the character in ways the TV show was trying to do but for various reasons never got the chance. This was a man of great moral integrity and a fire burned in him against all the injustice in the world. He wasn’t abrasive because he didn’t care, he was abrasive because he cared possibly too much. Here was a man who knew how the universe should work and was constantly pissed that the people in it weren’t living up to their potential. Many think given Capaldi’s previous role as Malcolm Tucker that this is the path he will choose to take with the Doctor. However, it is for that very reason I suspect this won’t be the route Capaldi takes his Doctor. As much as many of us now love the Sixth Doctor, I don’t think that either Moffat or Capaldi are stupid enough to try and go down this road given how badly it could blow up in their faces. If Capaldi channels anything from number Six, let it be his quick wit and passion against injustice and leave the rest to Colin Baker.

So, what do you think of my thoughts so far? Do you think I’m on the right track so far  or way off base? Part two covering the other Doctors will be up soon!

The Other NATO Calls For Two Minute Movie Trailers

This week, NATO, the National Association of Theatre Owners (who really should get a different name for their group so they don’t have to share their name with that other, FAR less famous NATO), put out a series of recommendations they hope movie theaters and companies will adopt. Among their list of proposals is the ideas that movie trailers should only be 2 minutes long and run only 150 days before a film’s release, with any other marketing in the theater also limited to 120 days. The film distributors would be able to override these rules for 2 films per year and could have a trailer that could then run for a whopping 3 whole minutes.

They then go one step further, folks. To curb your desire to have your phone out during the previews, the trailers cannot have any prompts to visit websites and they would not be able to have any third-party brands or endorsements. These new NATO guidelines would also require distributors to have to have special negotiations for the right to show special content like behind-the-scenes material and extended looks with the exhibitioners.

I get NATO’s goal of giving movie theater owners more control, but in the age of the internet is here people, and that genie is not going back into its bottle. With ever-evolving technology, movie theaters might not even exist anymore a generation or two from now  and you are only going to help speed up the process with ideas like this.

While I do agree that  trailers “are played in the theaters at the discretion of each theater chain or individual theater owner” may I remind you that a little trick of staying in business is to remain an asset to your distributors. You aren’t the only game in town for them to get their money anymore, you either get your head in the game or embrace your eventual irrelevance and nonexistence. Yes theater owners should be more involved, but they should be going for an explosion of content at their theaters. What is going to keep theaters alive is creative experiences and exclusives, some feature they can’t get at home or some footage they can’t get  (in good quality) online. Your patrons should be dazzled from the time they walk in your door to the time they walk out with content and options.

I love going to the movie theater, I hit up the Carmike 10 and/or the River 15 (the local theaters in my area) whenever I can, but if these are the best ideas NATO has to offer, then I fear for their future.

What are your thoughts about the length and exposure of movie trailers? What are some ways theaters can stay relevant in the 21st century? Let us know in the comments!

Via Deadline

Distinctive Style: Comic Book Creator Chris Kent speaks

Chris Kent is a busy man. As the founder of Graphite Fiction, he runs workshops and courses for aspiring comic book artists and writers in between painting, making furniture and publishing his own distinct graphic novels including ‘Medusa’ and the newly released ‘The Golem’. Recently, I had the opportunity to chat with Chris and find out all about him his life, and his work. He started off our discussion by speaking about his background, saying,

I was born in Darlington and grew up on Teesside. My mum was from Darlington and my dad was from East London – Leytonstone. My mum and dad ran the working men’s club on Thornaby Green. I used to play on the high flat roof, traveling on the ‘ocean’ to the ‘South Seas’, traveling the oceans in tea chests.

602620_10151045737677840_241603503_n

It’s very clear that Chris’ early life had a big influence on the work he does today.

I read various comics Marvel, DC, such bright colours, exciting drawing, plus Treasure, Smash, The Victor.

I continued drawing and painting,, and watching horror films and I started practicing stage horror make-up – building up layer with tissue and flour and water paste, before experimenting with latex. I worked on my own face and my young brother too.

A man after my own heart, Chris studied acting in college and then technical theater in London before finding himself working on comic book adaptations of Shakespeare as a colorist. I identify with Chris quite a lot; like me, he has been exploring varying different crafts to develop his own development rather than be content in one constant place. He continued down this path, saying,

After I moved back to the North again and studied fine art full time.  I was trying to work abstract for a while – lots of paint, and enjoyed the writing and research too. After art school, I felt like I needed a new challenge and started work on sculptures using wood, as well as running lots of art classes, often with people with mental health problems.

Suddenly wooden sculptures turned into wooden furniture – and I went into partnership for about 8 years making sculptural furniture. Working for architects, we designed and made high quality sculptural furniture – including chapel furniture and other unusual pieces. At this time I also developed work for exhibition which used wood blocks and text, sometimes collage. Somebody saw the work and asked if they were from a graphic novel!

From this, ‘Medusa’ and Graphite Fiction were born.

Medusa, like all of Chris’ work, has a distinct and unique style which is a brave departure from the bright, vivid kind of work we normally see. Chris makes it very clear that the simplistic sketches and paneling are very conscious stylistic decisions:

The Golem’s illustrations were an unreal style, a claustrophobic style about theater light and strong shadows. An obsessive drawing style, held in check by the 9 panel layout. They try to pull the viewer into the world of the Golem. I create in a very basic way using pencils and paper, sometimes acrylic paint, ink, collage, glue. When I ‘cut and paste’ I do it for real! It’s messy, but it’s natural to me!

MED#1ACOVER

The Golem Page 5

His Hammer Horror influence is incredibly visible and exciting. What appears simple upon first glance becomes more and more intricate and engaging. 

Influenced by such individuals as  Dave McKean, Will Eisner, Joe Sacco, plus Da Vinci, Rembrandt, El Greco, Picasso, Andrew Wyeth, Chris and his work make no attempt to conform to mainstream and in turn create some very striking and interesting works you can purchase over on the Graphite Fiction website along with keeping up to date on new releases. We will also have a review of ‘The Golem’ in the coming weeks.

“Kent’s art is pretty special. Medusa will repay several readings.” –The Skinny December 2009

“Artist and writer Chris Kent has produced a strong piece of complex work.Using collage, photo and painted art, Medusa has a unique look for a haunting tale of loss and longing. Visually strong, the black and white art captures a humanity in this nightmarish tale.Medusa is never less than intriguing. We eagerly await his future projects”. – The List January 2010

“A highly unusual, deeply disturbing, dark tale” – Joe Gordon, Forbidden Planet Blog

“Chris Kent’s distraught debut is a book that gets under your skin”. – Shelfabuse.com

You can also follow Chris on Twitter here: @xyler

 

Golem Cover

 

Movie Review: The Invisible Woman

Ralph Fiennes apparently has a knack for the double duty on set, as once again he stands in front of and behind the camera on this romantic period piece.

Now don’t get all huffy and run off, it may be a romantic period piece but it’s got ol’ Ralph playing the great author (and just wild human being) Charles Dickens. Patriarch of a distressingly huge family, after having used his wife for decades as a baby factory, his eyes light on a young actress, Nelly, played here by up-and-comer Felicity Jones.

I’m feeling younger and more spry myself just thinking about her.

These were different times, and a woman who decides to be a mistress better be sure she can keep that job, because there wasn’t much in the way of a retirement plan back then..

The Unusual Suspects are on the case to give you the heads up: Too dry and English-y (apologies to my British friends or anyone who respects the English language) or Too wet and mushy? Or maybe, just maybe, this one is just right. Ashley, Martin and Chris give ya the low-down.

Inside The Locker: Royal Bumble (with commentary!)

On Sunday last (because apparently we’re speaking like wandering Renaissance minstrels now), the sports nerds of Inside the Locker sat down with the erudite pundits of pain from All Rings Considered to watch WWE’s The Royal Rumble and record a commentary.

For those of you who are not wrestling-inclined, The Royal Rumble is the WWE’s version of Thunderdome, but on a much grander scale. Thirty men enter, one man…remains in the ring to point victoriously at a hanging banner for a completely separate pay-per-view.  So…actually nothing like Thunderdome.

The ending of this year’s Rumble was met with considerable controversy, but along the way we had a great time cracking wise and fielding questions from the live chat. We also engaged in a randomized numerical pool to see who could blind select the combatant who would either win it all or at least remain in the ring the longest.

The bell has been rung, the luchador masks properly stowed, but feel free to download and listen to our commentary anyway. That is, if you enjoy our particular brand of shenanigans.

 

 

allringsconsidered

And don’t forget to check out All Rings Considered over at Geek Bombast. John and Amanda truly are fantastic wrestling commentators.

 

Check Out A Hilarious And Charming Behind The Scenes Look at ‘The LEGO Movie’

If you don’t think The LEGO Movie looks like a lot of fun, then maybe this will change your mind. In anticipation of the release of Christopher Miller and Phil Lord’s upcoming film, the studio released a pretty humorous behind the scenes video featuring the LEGO characters talking about the upcoming film. I was already sold on the film when the first trailer came out, but this just puts me over the top and can’t wait to see how much fun it ends up being.

Having grown up with LEGOs as a kid, it’s always fun to actually see someone’s imagination brought to life and in some ways reminisce about your own adventures with the toys. I look back in disappointment that I never had the superhero LEGO characters that are out there now because that would have caused an endless amount of entertainment for this kid, growing up in a small town and all, with very little to do.

The video takes the LEGO characters and lets them loose talking about the film: their experiences filming, what they think of the actor playing them and what they think of their directors. The standout for me is Will Arnett and his Batman character. Everything with him in this video is gold, but the scene the video shows of him trying to hit a button with blunt object to open a gate is especially hilarious. The video will only take up less than four minutes of your life and come on, it features a joke about Morgan Freeman’s voice making the phone book interesting…literally! Check it out!

 

 

There are several jokes just about how LEGOs work in general that are just charming and fun so at this point I don’t know how anyone can not at least be curious to check this one ou plus, it has an awesome cast to boot. The LEGO Movie hits theaters February 7th, just in time for Valentine’s Day! Which of course is what every kid at heart will be begging their significant other to see rather than whatever Nicholas Sparks wannabe happens to be in theaters at the time.

Are you excited for The LEGO Movie? What did you think of the behind the scenes video? Let us know what you think in the comments!

‘Pitch Perfect’ Actress To Direct Sequel

Okay, so aside from a few performance scenes, Elizabeth Banks wasn’t in much of Pitch Perfect, but she was in the film nonetheless. In any case, Banks is not only going to make her directorial debut with the sequel, but she will be returning to reprise her commentator role as well. Also likely to return to star in the sequel are Anna Kendrick and Rebel Wilson.

There may not be a lot of dude points in admitting that I like Pitch Perfect, but to be honest I actually dig the film quite a bit. It’s light easy-to-watch entertainment and Anna Kendrick is not only funny, but easy on the eyes. There is quite a bit of cheesy eye-rolling dialogue here and there and the songs aren’t always my cup of tea, but the film is undeniably charming and it’s pretty simple to find one’s self tapping or nodding along to the a cappella versions of the popular tunes.

Also in the growing list of returning Pitch Perfect alum is writer Kay Cannon. The first film was a huge hit among moviegoers when it was released, making over $100+ million worldwide on a budget that was under $20 million not to mention its ridiculous success on DVD and the soundtrack. The film also spawned the massive hit for Anna Kendrick’s song “Cups” which was featured in the film during her audition, which radio stations have been playing TO DEATH ever since.

There is not news on what the sequel will entail or who else may be returning to star or what hot pop culture commodity might be added to the cast. It’s likely we won’t see the sequel until sometime next year so there’s plenty of time to speculate on story ideas and possible co-stars for the film.

Who do you think should be cast/recast for the Pitch Perfect sequel? Did you enjoy the original film? Is Banks the right choice to direct? Let us know what you think in the comment section!

Via: THR

Digital Noise Episode 29: Pirates of the Polar Vortex

It’s cold in Austin, like super cold. The kind of cold that requires an actual coat and not just a light jacket.

Despite these hellish conditions (can you tell we’ve been spoiled by living in Texas yet?), Brian and Chris soldier on; making sure to bring you that weekly dose of Digital Noise we know you crave. You do crave it, right? No yeah, you totally do.

This week, the guys irresponsibly set sail with Captain Phillips, pet a few Cat People, say enough about Enough Said, take some time to talk about About Time, and decide it’s in their best interest to Never Sleep Again. They also come up with maybe the worst YouTube show idea of all time (hint, it involves Madame Tussauds), and construct an out-of-this-world Gravity score giveaway.

Baby, it may be cold outside, but you can stay in and stay warm wrapped in the sonorous auditory quilt that is Digital Noise.

 

Thinking of purchasing any of the titles we discussed? Or anything from Amazon in general? Please access Amazon via our links to help support the site. We really appreciate it.

Captain Phillips Blu-ray Review   About Time Blu-ray Review   Enough Said Blu-ray Review

Empty Space

Cat People Blu-ray Review   Dead Weight DVD Review   Die Monster Die Blu-ray review

Empty Space

Charlie Countryman Blu-ray Review   Never Sleep Again Blu-ray Review  Best Man Down Blu-ray Review

Empty Space

Bad Milo Blu-ray Review   Gravity Score CD

 

How To Win This Week’s Giveaway:

1.) Follow @OneOfUsNet on Twitter

2.) Tweet at us with your idea for a Digital Noise tagline. (e.g. Digital Noise: The Other White Meat…but not that).

3.) Add hashtag #gravityscoregiveaway

4.) We’ll select our favorite and contact that winner via Twitter. (U.S. Residents only)

 

Follow Digital Noise on Twitter and make sure to review us on iTunes.

Kevin Smith Sets Sights on Krampus Anthology Inspired By Smodcast Show

Remember when Kevin Smith said he was going to retire from filmmaking following Clerks III? Well, it’s been some time since that announcement and Clerks III has yet to materialize, though it seems a the director wants to begin shooting the sequel April 7th. After that, is his time in the director’s chair over? Not quite. Smith has now announced that he hopes to shoot and release Comes the Krampus! after Clerks III. In other words, Smith’s retirement is not still on hold.

Comes the Krampus! will be an anthology horror film along the lines of Creepshow and is based off one of the many shows in the Smodcast Network, Edumacation. Taken from Episode 20 of the aforementioned show “Big Man on Krampus,” in which the legend of Krampus is discussed at length. Smith’s Edumacation co-host Andy McElfresh banged out a script for the anthology in less than a month (the show aired 12/23/13). McElfresh, Smith, Jason Mewes, and more (including Smith’s wife, Jen) will be directing the various segments of the film.

Krampus, is the bizzaro version of Santa Claus essentially. Instead of a jolly fat guy who travels the globe delivering joy under your Christmas tree every year Krampus is often a hideous creature who simply loves to eat children. Comes the Krampus! will be a series of four shots along with one framing story to tie them all together. Smith expands on the idea by saying that the script as is could be a very low budget effort not unlike his latest Smodcast film awaiting release, Tusk.

In other Smodcast news, Smith was originally toying around with another Smodcast topic being adapted to film, Helena Handbag. The director has since decided to switch that project up and will be adapting it as a musical instead with The Book of Mormon as his muse.

Each of these bits and pieces of news kind of have me excited. I’ve been listening to Smodcast for years and I have often found Kevin Smith to be very creative and funny, even if I do get kinda burned out by hearing a lot of the same jokes from show to show. I still really like Red State (though more for Michael Parks than anything else) and I have a morbid curiosity to see how Tusk turns out, but I think Smith still has a lot of things he can accomplish in the film industry so to see his retirement put on hiatus for a little bit isn’t all bad news to me.

What do you think of the idea for Comes The Krampus!? Are you a Kevin Smith fan? What’s your favorite Smith film? Thoughts on all his upcoming projects? Sound off below!

Via: Silent Bob Speaks – Krampus, SBS – Helena Handbag

Trailer Reaction: ‘Maleficent’

Everyone loves a good villain. Sure, we root for the hero and want to see them win at some point before the end, but many movies succeed because their villain is so memorable. One such example is Disney’s 1959 animated adaptation of Sleeping Beauty, which featured the scheming enchantress of evil, Maleficent. Well, 55 years later Disney has decided to cash in on the appeal of the horned and slickly dressed villainess with a spin-off movie entitled (creatively enough) Maleficent, which is set to release on May 30th of this year & a new trailer has just dropped.

As the trailer blatantly points out, “You Know the Tale”; Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) is a wicked fairy who lives outside of an unnamed kingdom in the dark forests. One evening, at a party celebrating King Stefan’s (Sharlto Copley) newborn daughter Aurora, Maleficent crashes the festivities to place an irrevocable curse on the child. However, this prequel/re-imagining seeks to explore Maleficent’s motives for such an act, which seems to promise a more political rift between her and the king which results in warfare between the kingdom and Maleficent’s magical army from the forest. In the middle of all this conflict, an adolescent Aurora (Elle Fanning) must try to find a middle ground between the forest she’s grown to love and the kingdom she’s destined to rule. Watch the trailer below:

Based on this trailer, there’s a lot to like about Maleficent on an aesthetic level. The film looks gorgeous in terms of production, costume and visual effects design. It’s quite clear that veteran visual effects and art director Robert Stromberg (whom won Academy Awards for his art direction on Avatar and Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland) has made sure that his directorial debut will be stunning to see. The trailer also makes sure to emphasize the dark fantasy nature of the story, most notably with the moments of Angelina Jolie gleefully taking on the part of a wicked magical enchantress and the use of Lana Del Rey’s haunting cover of “Once Upon A Dream”, the central song from Sleeping Beauty. 

So, the film is definitely getting across what it wants to convey visually… but is the content there? Maleficent as a villain worked in her original form, but is there really enough to her to make a spin-off film worth it? Based on what limited details we have, I’m really not that sure. While I did mention the film looks stupendous, I’d still say it looks fairly reminiscent of many a post-Lord of the Rings trilogy fantasy film that’s come out in the last ten years or so. Big tree creatures, warring factions racing at each other, magical side creatures, etc. It all just feels so familiar and having a first time director mostly known for his visuals and not his story telling worries me even more.

I do still have some hope for Maleficentthough. Jolie looks like she’s definitely embracing the part and providing a lot of devilish charm. It helps that we have up and comers like Elle Fanning and Sharlto Copley in key supporting roles who can probably pick up the slack as well. Plus, there’s also the biggest factor in the movie’s favor: the screenwriters. There are two credited writers for Maleficent, one of which is Linda Woolverton who is responsible for some of Disney’s biggest hits of the last twenty years, for better (The Lion KingBeauty and the Beast) or worse (Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland). The second is Paul Dini, a veteran of television writing best known for his work on Bruce Timm’s DC Animated Universe, especially Batman: The Animated Series. Dini and Woolverton are both responsible for some of the more memorable female characters of my generation’s childhood, whether they be Belle or Harley Quinn. Characters with dimension and flaws, yet are also strong in their own individual ways. Surely, they can give this potential cash in enough character to make it worth my cold hard cash, right?

But what about you out there? What do you think of the trailer for Maleficent? Do you think the villain can carry the film? Or is there another Disney villain far more worthy of a stand alone project? Personally, my vote still goes to Hades from Hercules.

Via YouTube